Boston Sports Medicine and Performance Group, LLC Blog

BSMPG 2014 Summer Seminar - Neil Rampe - Arizona Diamondbacks

Posted by Boston Sports Medicine and Performance Group on Mon, Sep 30, 2013 @ 07:09 AM

BSMPG is proud to announce Neil Rampe as the first speaker added to the 2014 BSMPG Summer Seminar speaker list - May 16-18th, 2014. Last year was a sell out and the only difference this year will be us announcing a sell out a month in advance!  This will be one of the greatest performance and therapy seminars of all time!

Seriously, this will sell out - Registration will open January 1st, 2014.  Members of the BSMPG family will receive an opportunity to reserve their seat in advance - stay tuned for details.  With speakers and attendees traveling from around the world, this seminar will close in record time.

Be sure to save the date and reserve your hotel room well in advance.

See you in Boston next May!!!

 

BSMPG

 

NEIL RAMPE

Manual Therapist for the Arizona Diamondbacks

BSMPG

SPONSORED BY:

 

INSIDETRACKER

 

Neil Rampe is currently in his sixth year as the Manual Therapist for Major League Baseball’s Arizona Diamondbacks. Neil’s education includes an AA in Personal Training as well as BS in Athletic Training and Physical Education with an emphasis in Strength & Conditioining from the University of Findlay. He went on to receive his M.Ed. in Applied Kinesiology with a Sport and Exercise Science emphasis from the University of Minnesota where he served as a strength & conditioning coach in the golden gopher athletic department. Neil then served as a certified athletic trainer at the Boulder Center for Sports Medicine in Boulder, CO. Neil then spent five years at The University of Arizona where he served as the Associate Dierctor, Performance Enhancement. Neil is a Certified Athletic Trainer through the NATABOC, a Certified Strength & Conditioning Specialist through the NSCA, a Licensed Massage Therapist through the AMTA and NCBTMB. Neil is also a Certified Active Release Techniques provider, Functional Range Release provider and has received his Performance Enhancement Specialist and Corrective Exercise Specialist advanced specializations through the National Academy of Sports Medicine. Neil is also a C level DNS practitioner the The Prague School of Rehabilitation and a PRT (Postural Restoration Trained) through The Postural Restoration Institute. Over the past 14 years Neil has had the opportunity to consult and work with a number of elite athletes at the high school collegiate, olympic and professional ranks in the areas of rehabilitation, therapy and performance enhancement.

 

New Call to action

 

 

Topics: Patrick Ward, Neil Rampe, BSMPG Summer Seminar, Ben Prentiss, Fergus Connolly

Your Body is NOT a Machine, and I am NOT a Mechanic

Posted by Boston Sports Medicine and Performance Group on Wed, Sep 25, 2013 @ 07:09 AM

 

BSMPG

Your Body is Not a Machine, and I am Not a Mechanic.

(And we clinicians do not “fix” you.)

 

And if I could make the title longer: I do not treat with a “toolbox.” In fact, I’m nearly incompetent with anything more complex than a screwdriver and an Ikea desk, never mind the human body.

 

This idea came to me after a recent exchange with a patient. I had been treating her for about a month and she was frustrated with her continued struggle dealing with her back pain. Feeling debilitated she lamented that she didn’t think she would ever get better, and that she was completely crippled by her symptoms. She told me she couldn’t sleep, sit, or exercise without thinking about her back, and she didn’t understand why she wasn’t fixed and why no one knew “what’s wrong with her” (my quotations). In an email to her, I wrote the following:

 

“Your back will get better if you let it.  Which means listening to it. Not pushing into pain, or getting yourself worked up, but finding things that are calming, and nourishing for your back. Like gentle swimming, variable movements, deep breathing. When it hurts, its a call to action to change whatever you're doing. When what you're doing feels good, its a call to action to do it more. You are in charge of yourself...not me, not an MRI machine, not an MD. Commit to this and see it through!”

 

She seemed to respond positively to this sense of empowerment I was trying to instill, and although it took a month for me to get there, I realized that I needed to start incorporating this language Day 1 of my patient interaction. Too often I get a sense of dependence from my patients. Dependence upon myself, their doctor, their surgeon, their radiograph, etc.  instead of an ownership of their wellbeing. And looking back, I realize that I am probably guilty of fostering this exact dependence that I am trying to get rid of! How many times have I told someone “you need x, and you need to come here 2-3 times a week”. Patients come to us with expectations, and we feel obligated to meet them. Just like when I bring my car to the mechanic, I want to know the problem (diagnosis), solution (treatment), and cost (prognosis), and so do my patients. So we create different assessments and objective measures to figure out the problem and then manual interventions and exercises to “fix it.” But it perpetuates a belief that their body is made up of parts, instead of a whole complex system. And that if we can fix the part, we can fix the system.  But shouldn’t it be the other way around?

 

As my own brain continues change, I have begun focusing my efforts on changing other’s. Movement and pain are both centrally driven, and so we must always start there. And yes, we are purported to be movement experts, so it makes sense to have a strong foundation in motor control. It does seem odd however, that we don’t strive to be known as pain experts as well, since that’s usually what brings people to us in the first place. Adriaan Louw posed a great question at the last BSMPG conference. He asked: Why do people come see us in pain, and leave as experts in biomechanics?  Shouldn’t education, reduction of threat and locus of control be given to the patient during the first evaluation? Perhaps if we placed higher value on these things, we would be less enamored with building up our own toolbox, and focus instead on building one for our patients.

 

 

Chris Joyce is a curiously skeptical physical therapist working in an outpatient clinic in Boston. He can be reached at cjoyce@sportsandpt.com 

 

Register for  Charlie Weingroff Seminar Oct 25-27, 2013

 

Register for  DNS "A" Course June 27-29, 2014

 

 

Topics: Charlie Weingroff, Chris Joyce, BSMPG Summer Seminar

Quick Thoughts on Barefoot Training by Charlie Weingroff

Posted by Boston Sports Medicine and Performance Group on Fri, Sep 6, 2013 @ 07:09 AM

Question to Charlie via charlieweingroff.com: 

I wanted to know your opinion on training without shoes or using the Vibrams or other brands.
Also I have extremely flat feet.  How do you think this will impact me?

 

barefoot training 

 

As a blanket statement, I’d like to think and say that I’d like to get everyone doing as much as possible in most general physical preparedness barefoot.
And that statement is vague and non-committal intentionally.  I often wrestle with the list of benefits that make so much sense but then there are some antagonistic thoughts that also make a lot of sense too.

1) My favor for training barefoot does not include running without progression.  I am not well schooled in running form and the effects of different footwear.  Part of this is whenever I seem to read something, even of alleged substance, there is anecdotal success in every option.  Maybe this is why I can’t get into these topics because everybody has something different to say in terms of heel strike, etc.  Some say bad; others say no difference like the research we see coming out of the US Army.  I wasn’t particularly moved by their presentation at SOMA as they had no control for the rest of the body in terms of the default pattern that the subjects were coached to use.
Bottom line is I think running barefoot should be progressed into with great caution, and it may not be for everybody.  This is just not a topic that has a lot of gravity for me in all honesty.

2) What does have gravity for me is training barefoot.  Eliminating the sole of a shoe allowing for uptake of tactile proprioception is a very big victory.  Variables such as improved technical proficiency of fundamental and training patterns and subjective recovery are things that stick out as often remarkable changes from training barefoot.

Continue reading article by clicking HERE.  

 

Register for  Charlie Weingroff Seminar Oct 25-27, 2013

 

Learn more about barefoot training, barefoot pitfalls, and how to best incorporate barefoot work into your existing training programs by reading, BAREFOOT IN BOSTON.

 

 

Topics: Charlie Weingroff, BSMPG Summer Seminar

Bill Knowles - BSMPG Summer Seminar Highlights

Posted by Boston Sports Medicine and Performance Group on Mon, Aug 26, 2013 @ 07:08 AM

 

Click below to see highlights from our 2013 BSMPG Summer Seminar featuring Bill Knowles.

More highlights are set to come in the next few weeks so stay tuned!

A special thanks again to our SPONSORS! 

 

 

Register for  Charlie Weingroff Seminar Oct 25-27, 2013

 


Topics: Charlie Weingroff, BSMPG Summer Seminar, Bill Knowles

Marco Cardinale - BSMPG Summer Seminar Highlights

Posted by Boston Sports Medicine and Performance Group on Mon, Aug 12, 2013 @ 07:08 AM

 

 

Click below to see highlights from our 2013 BSMPG Summer Seminar featuring Marco Cardinale.

More highlights are set to come in the next few weeks so stay tuned!

A special thanks again to our SPONSORS! 

 


 

 

Register for  Charlie Weingroff Seminar Oct 25-27, 2013

Topics: Charlie Weingroff, BSMPG Summer Seminar, Marco Cardinale

Is it a Placebo if it Works?

Posted by Boston Sports Medicine and Performance Group on Mon, Aug 5, 2013 @ 07:08 AM

 

 

Placebo

 

 

BSMPG

"In an experimental study designed in part to measure fear-avoidance behavior, 50 patients with chronic pain were randomly divided into 2 groups prior to performing a leg flexion test. One group was informed that the test could lead to a slight increase in pain, whereas the other group was told the test was painless. The patients who were told that there would be an increase in pain reported stronger pain and performed fewer leg flexion repetitions than those who received neutral instructions." 

 

Pfingsten M, Leibing E, Harter W, et al. Fear-avoidance behavior and anticipation of pain in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized control study. Pain Med.2001;2:259-266.

 

pills 

"Moerman and Jones have suggested thinking about placebo in a new and different way, a way that can help clinicians foster positive desired effects. They explain their contention by analyzing 2 fascinating studies. In the first, a group of medical students are asked to participate in a study of 2 new drugs, one a tranquilizer and the other a stimulant. Each student was given a packet containing either 1 or 2 blue or red tablets. The students were not told that all the tablets were inert and contained no medicine. After taking the tablets, the students' responses to a questionnaire indicated that the red tablets acted as stimulants, whereas the blue ones acted as depressants; taking 2 tablets had more effects than taking just 1. The students were not responding to the inert tables. Instead, they were responding to "meanings" in the experiment, specifically that red generally means up, hot, or danger, whereas the blue means down, cool, or quiet; and the 2 pills will be twice as strong as 1." 

 

Blackwell B, Bloomfield SS, Buncher CR. Demonstration to medical students of placebo responses and non-drug factors. Lancet.1972;299:1289-1282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(72)90996-8

 

 

white coat

 

“The practice of medicine, including physical therapy, is infiltrated with meaning, from the vernacular of medical language to the tradition of dress, rituals, paperwork, waiting room, and formality, each of which can exert positive or negative influences on our patients. Furthermore, clinician mannerisms (enthusiastic or lukewarm) and language (positive or negative) impart meaning to the patient and can influence outcomes.” Flynn, p.440

  

 

Join Charlie Weingroff and other Leaders in Sports Medicine and Performance Oct. 25-27th for a seminar that will live forever!

 

Register for  Charlie Weingroff Seminar Oct 25-27, 2013

Topics: Charlie Weingroff, BSMPG Summer Seminar

Mark Lindsay - BSMPG 2013 Summer Seminar Highlights

Posted by Boston Sports Medicine and Performance Group on Mon, Jul 22, 2013 @ 07:07 AM

Click below to see highlights from our 2013 BSMPG Summer Seminar featuring Mark Lindsay.

More highlights are set to come in the next few weeks so stay tuned!

A special thanks again to our SPONSORS! 

 

 

 

Register for  Charlie Weingroff Seminar Oct 25-27, 2013

Topics: BSMPG Summer Seminar, Bill Knowles, Mark Lindsay

Marvin Chun - BSMPG 2013 Summer Seminar Highlights

Posted by Boston Sports Medicine and Performance Group on Mon, Jun 24, 2013 @ 07:06 AM

Click below to see highlights from our 2013 BSMPG Summer Seminar featuring Marvin Chun.

More highlights are set to come in the next few weeks so stay tuned!

A special thanks again to our SPONSORS! 

 

 

 

Register for  Charlie Weingroff Seminar Oct 25-27, 2013

 

Charlie Weingroff boston

 


Topics: BSMPG Summer Seminar, Marvin Chun

The Future of Sports Science in America

Posted by Boston Sports Medicine and Performance Group on Wed, Jun 19, 2013 @ 07:06 AM

An interview with Fergus Connolly following the 2013 BSMPG Summer Seminar.
Fergus Connolly Fergus Connolly

After what Stu McGill at BSMPG, referred to as "the best presentation I've heard in 26 years in sport", I sat down with Fergus Connolly before he left Boston to explore in more detail the future of high performance sport here in the US.  With the surge in sports analytics and ability to capture sports metrics along with a personal interest in managing and presenting data, Fergus’ presentation couldn’t have come at a better time

We discussed many things, but I started by asking him to give some insight into the future challenges professional sports faces in the US and what our professional teams needed to avoid in the future.

This is the transcript of some of the recorded interview. 
 

"Give me six hours to chop down a tree and I will spend the first four sharpening the axe" - Abraham Lincoln 

[Q]
Fergus, based your work with NFL and NBA teams – is US professional sport is going through a short phase of sports science or a critical changing period?

I've gone on record as saying I believe US sport really is at a very interesting crossroads just now, I think the preparation of professional teams is changing. There is a more informed awareness, media attention on performance, better appreciation of fatigue, about critical injuries, return to play approaches, a fascination in performance technology along with more and more data available for everyone - customer included!
These developments, along with a leveling off in advantages from analytical recruitment approaches mean the focus has now shifted to find Moneyball 3.0 - and it's pretty clear this new edge is going to be sports science. There's not a team I know that are not aware of the developments and changes they face. This a big challenge for the NFL and NBA teams to address - and most importantly to do it correctly. It's a big tree to chop.
And, so with such a big tree to chop down, to paraphrase President Lincoln - it's best spend the time sharpening the axe rather than swinging wildly.

So you think there are two attitudes or approaches to this?


Well, some teams are moving fast, but I notice the more progressive GM's and directors are doing due diligence, not being slow - but steady, asking better questions and identifying the pathway they want to move towards, not making knee-jerk decisions.

"Don't have time to do it right, but the money to do it twice."

[Q]
Ok, so accepting that these changes are here and coming, and recognizing care is needed to avoid knee jerk movements - what is the biggest challenge these teams and the performance staff face?

Ok, so looking at the two sports I know most about - and to simplify it greatly, the challenge is player volume management and game volume management - in the NBA it's about game volume management and in the NFL it's about player volume management. Unfortunately in many professional sporting situations, and I'm thinking of the NBA as one stand-out example from my experiences here in the US, the time pressures are immense.
Speak to guys like Bill Burgos, Bryan Doo, Keke Lyles or others and you'll soon learn 82 games a season with the travel demands combined leaves little time for much actual development - either player or staff. Everything is geared toward management of the player, game by game.

And football?

In the NFL you have far greater numbers training and it's a case of player management, individualization is much more difficult. So it's no wonder that it can be a "Time once, Money Twice" effect in pro-sport, where the teams "Don't have time to do it right, but the resources to do it twice." It's not a criticism - the sports almost demand it by design and all sports I've worked in are somewhat similar, whether it's the English Premiership or International Rugby. It's certainly difficult to keep the bigger picture in mind, but what is often missed - is that having to do it twice will cost twice as much and take twice as long regardless!
This is where the better organizations develop sports science, not slowly, but smoothly, introducing and investing in new positions and new technologies - and managing their implementation with clear long term goals in clear view for all.

"80% of Sports Science is knowing what NOT to do. The other 20% of the job is knowing how to deliver it"

[Q]
Well that brings us along nicely to the next question about Sports Science - which as you are well aware is the new buzz word - what do you see as the biggest challenge for sports science in the US?


Yes, Sports Science is probably the single greatest area of fascination in US sport just now, certainly in the NFL. I think it's a really good development for the player welfare first and foremost, and I'm glad to see teams like the Jaguars and the Eagles start to develop sports science programs.
I know Tom Myslinski for many years and have great respect for what he and the Khan family are doing, and I know Josh Hingst too at the Eagles. Neither are naive, they know the limitations and time it will take to develop the programs.

What about the NBA?

Good question Art,  basketball is an interesting animal all on its own, however – I believe the first NBA teams to master and integrated sports science approach will benefit much more and more quickly in injury reduction and reduced fatigue. Simply because of the reduced player roster - these improvements will be much easier to affect. I also expect them to compete at a more consistent level.

But sports science is definitely here to stay?

Correct and the good news is that, for the US sports scientist today, it is very like being a child in a candy store - there are more toys available now than ever, it's like Christmas Day every day. However, the bad news is - "batteries not included" - some technologies will work, many don't and most only work in certain contexts. For that reason alone, I make it clear to teams that "80% of a good sports scientist’s role is to know what NOT to do, the other 20% of the job is knowing how to deliver it".

Very good point, but sports science is a very young field here with those with experience are few and far between.

True, but bear in mind, just because you have a technology and perhaps know how to use it, you still have to present and manage the delivery of this to the players and coaches too and make sure the outcome is successful.
One other confusing aspect of sports science is that people think just because you have something you have to use it. Think of it as if you were making a fruit salad - if you had tomatoes in the fridge you wouldn't use them in a fruit salad even though they are a fruit and just because you have them.      

"Million Dollar Athlete and 2 Cent Therapist"

[Q]
Ok, so bearing that food analogy in mind - where can we expect to see sports science being used to its greatest effect in US pro sport?


I believe there are 2 broad areas sports science will impact, Injury prevention (or reduction) and improved on court/grass performance. US sport has clearly pioneered recruitment, and European and Southern Hemisphere sport has so much to learn from you. However, how you support the recruited athlete is equally important and has huge room for improvement in the US.

I’m glad you mentioned this. I often find that teams make tremendous investments in players yet when it comes to player health or development see this as an extra cost that they are not willing to put forward.
 
Yes. Good coaches or Performance Directors like Bill Sweentenham, the legendary Australian swim coach, used go to great trouble and make a point of recruiting elite level sports science staff to ensure his swimmers were the best prepared in the world and had no excuses. There's no point in having an elite athlete and not having the systems, resources and environment to support them. It's akin to buying a million dollar sports car and not having the money for engine oil or a service. Sure, it'll manage at first, but eventually fail and perform poorly given time.

But will this change in the US?

It is changing, I know two US NFL teams who are already applying some of the recruitment diligence standards to their staffing and resources as they do to players to avoid mismanagement. An old mentor of mine used refer to this as having the "Million Dollar Athlete and 2 Cent Therapist" approach. By "therapist" he didn't mean a person necessarily, rather the complete support structure.
The irony is that, I've found, in some of the most successful teams and organizations, quality athletes often recognize good support structures and accept slightly lower salaries to come work, compete and win in environments where the support is better.    

“A system is people and technology – not technology alone”

[Q]
Finally, Fergus, read the future once more - what is the "next big thing" for physical preparation in professional US sport?


One of the next major developments and "fashions" in US sport will be a demand for computer systems to manage the myriad of data lines coming downstream from all the various technologies being introduced, rightly or wrongly. This will lead a rush for off-the-shelf software to address this problem. While this will bring it's own issues, it will miss the fundamental point - a system is not about software alone.

But if it's not about software, how are the data issues addressed?

 
Performance Systems by my definition, and at this stage I've built and implemented 3 completely different systems, are combined human and technology solutions - the people employed are as critical, perhaps more so, than the actual technologies and software. A “system” is people and technology together – not technology alone. More importantly the technology can't be off-the shelf or standalone - they must suit the team and environment concerned.
At Northeastern here Art, you've recognized the needs of the environment which has led to the integration of sports medicine and performance services as one - you also know you need to develop a solution specific to your environment with regards to data management – something most colleges haven’t even considered as of yet.  I often warn teams that in many cases this - a performance management software system - is the single fastest way to throw money away, and you only have to look across at some manufacturing industries to see that. It is a pathway, a process and it's fluid, but controlled and it needs extremely careful management to ensure it succeeds.         

So what you're saying is that it's a double edged sword?

Yes, just buying a few Catapult units isn't Sports Science. Anyone can do that - making it work and affect winning is what matters. Whether it's the NFL or NBA, the game will stay the same, now there are just some small tools that are going make preparing for it a bit easier and make training a bit more effective.
Look, the bottom line is that it's all about outperforming the other guy - you've heard the joke about the two guys in the jungle and they see a lion running towards them. One of the men starts putting on his running shoes. Amazed at this, the other man says to his colleague "What are you thinking, you can't outrun a lion!". "I don't have to outrun the lion," says the first man, "I just have to outrun you."
Well Art, almost every NBA and NFL team is up and running or starting to run, but only some have tied their running shoes.

Thanks Fergus – can we count on seeing you return to BSMPG for an encore presentation?

Certainly, I’d love to come back. Apart from Boston being Ireland’s second city and feeling right at home, the BSMPG conference was an excellent event to be part of and contribute to. It’s got a unique vibe to it. Not to mention, having heard some possible speakers you’ve looked at for next year, I actually expect 2014 to be an even better and more exciting event, believe it or not.

Register for  Charlie Weingroff Seminar Oct 25-27, 2013

Topics: BSMPG Summer Seminar, Fergus Connolly

Are you doing what you think you are doing?

Posted by Boston Sports Medicine and Performance Group on Tue, Jun 11, 2013 @ 07:06 AM

As the world of physical medicine continues to forge ahead with evidence breakthroughs and paradigm shifts there appears to emerge 3 distinct bodies of clinicians/researchers whom all make very compelling cases why their methodologies are superior for treating patients in pain. Appropriately, a cornerstone of each model is exercise, or better yet, movement.  The three ideas:

 

Biomechanical Model: There is a correct, and incorrect way to move based off of ideal joint alignment and muscle synergies, and once deviations occur improper stresses are placed on nerves, muscles, ligaments and joints, which then cause pain.  For the most part, pain is fixed by improving a person’s strength and/or mobility and taking pressure off of said structures.  Treatment is guided by evidence using mostly biomechanical assessments and EMG studies to target specific muscles.

 


bsmpg  bsmpg                          

 

Neuromuscular Model: There is a correct and incorrect way to move governed by the central nervous system. Motor patterns developed during childhood represent movement in it’s most natural state and thus are our entryway into restoring proper function of our neuromuscular system. Emphasis is placed upon motor control, proper muscle timing and activation or deactivation of certain muscles.  Believes that pain is caused by improper stresses on joints, muscles, nerves and ligaments, but also recognizes the connection between movement and pain in the brain, and changing a person’s movement will change their pain. Treatment utilizes different techniques aimed at restoring proper motor function, with principles grounded in evidence.

                        

 

bsmpg   bsmpg

 

Pain Model: There is no perfect way of movement, but rather all movement is good in variability and moderation, and lack of movement is bad. Movement mechanics are largely a construct of westernized medicine and have little relevance to actual pain past the initial insult.  Recognizes that improper stresses on joints, muscles, nerves and ligaments cause acute pain, but that pain is always an output from the brain and thus all treatment must be focused on the neuroplasticity of the brain.  Changing the brain’s perception of movement will change their pain, and changing a patient’s perception of pain, will change their brain.  Treatment is focused on patient education, patient ownership, and the neural tissues of the body.

 

bsmpg         bsmpg             

 

 

Why Rehab Works:

 

My goal is not to push people to subscribe one school of thought since it is likely that they all have their place, but rather to introduce the idea that perhaps when you’re prescribing exercise, it may be working for other reasons than you believe. For example:

 

Breathing

I won’t get into the importance about assessing your patient’s respiratory pattern-there’s an overflow of information coming out on this. But here is why breathing works in all three models:

 

Biomechanical: When properly done full exhalation engages the obliques and pulls the ribcage down into the transverse plane, optimizing its position for respiration and stabilization. According to McGill peak stabilization of the abdominal cavity occurs not at full inhalation, but in the first part of exhalation, or during the weird grunting noise you hear people make as they flirt between squeezing out that last rep or having an aneurysm. It is here that muscles responsible for stabilization of the lower back are working synergistically to prevent shear forces on discs and spinal nerves. 

 

 

bsmpg

 

Neuromuscular: One of baby’s first skeletal muscles to ever contract post-partum is the diaphragm. Restoring proper breathing is the very first step in reprogramming motor patterns.  Piggybacking the biomechanical model, it is imperative in stabilizing the spine, which becomes the building block for the neurodevelopment of the child. As the child moves through positions in supine, then rolling, then prone etc…the spine stabilizes first in each position before coordinated extremity movements occur. Thus by placing patients into developmental positions and cuing breathing and stabilization, we are bringing motor control back to its most primitive patterns and improving neuromuscular control

 

Pain: Push play on any meditation series and the very first thing the calm soothing voice whispers to you is to draw attention to your breath. 1) it takes your mind off of anything else you may be thinking of (pain!) and 2) slow deep breaths shift your nervous system from sympathetic to parasympathetic, and we all need some of that.  There is a strong positive correlation between anxiety, stress and pain.  If we can decrease a patient’s stress, we can decrease their pain. One of the primary methods used with patients in chronic pain is meditation, and the breath is once again the foundation.    

 

Hip Hinges

 

bsmpg 

 

Biomechanical Model: Improving hip mobility will decrease lumbar mobility, and thus improve lumbar stability. If we move more with our hips, we move less with our back and avoid unnecessary forces on discs, nerves, muscles and tissues. Hip hinging drives glute activation, decreases lumbar flexion, and improve hip flexion. The joint by joint approach suggests a mobile hip and a stabile lumbar spine is the anatomical function of the lumbopelvic complex.

 

Neuromuscular Model: Have you ever looked at someone’s back and seen two guy-wires running down the sides of their spine, as if they were about to deadlift a car. Only problem is they are just standing.  

 

bsmpg

(Tone much?)

 

This display of hypertonicity is an indication that there is insufficient activation of the deep stabilizers, and over activation of the global muscles. Likely caused by repetition of movements without proper stabilization, the key to restoring appropriate muscle synergy is to look into motor patterns that are incorrectly recruiting the erectors instead of deep spinal stabilizers. Instructing the patient how to move with their hips as opposed to the lower back avoids perpetuating this faulty motor control, and thus decreases erector activation.

 

Pain Model: Remember this guy?

 

bsmpg

 

Well it appears that he plays a major role in pain patterns, especially in those with chronic pain. Living in the sensory and motor cortices the homunculus is a representation of human body in the brain. Areas of the body with greater fine movement and sensation have larger real estate in the brain, such as the thumb and the mouth. In the presence of back pain, the back’s representation can grow and which causes unassociated movements to become lumped in with back pain. Movement therapy focused on painless specific movements will better define the cortical borders of one body part from another, and may help dissociate hip movement from back movement and therefore back pain.

 

There are plenty more examples that would elucidate the concept that exercise/movement “works” on various levels.

 

Bird Dogs:

Biomechanical: Core stabilization training

Neuromuscular: Crawling pattern for baby

Pain: Movement variability is key to changing pain neurotags, and how often during the day do you get down on your hands and knees and crawl like a baby??

 

Squats:

Biomechanical: Bigtime strength and mobility exercise

Neuromuscular: A major neurodevelopmental milestone

Pain: Lots of LE movement mapping

 

So next time you prescribe an exercise think to yourself: Am I doing what I think I’m doing?

 

Chris Joyce is a physical therapist at a sports orthopedic clinic in Boston. He’s currently completing a Sports Residency at Northeastern University, and can be reached at cjoyce@sportsandpt.com.

 

 

Register for  Charlie Weingroff Seminar Oct 25-27, 2013

Topics: Charlie Weingroff, Chris Joyce, BSMPG Summer Seminar